HomeBlogNews Papers Headline

If you send nothing to the Supreme Court, you go home with nothing – Kpemka

A Former Deputy Attorney General Joseph Dindiok Kpemka has said the outcomes of most cases that are sent to the court depend on the quality of the f

UPDATE: Criminal Trial of Collins Dauda & Others
Increase feeding grant – School Feeding Nat’l Coordinator urges gov’t as 3rd term begins
AHAFO MMDCES TO BE SWORN INTO OFFICE


A Former Deputy Attorney General Joseph Dindiok Kpemka has said the outcomes of most cases that are sent to the court depend on the quality of the facts that are presented to the judges.

In his view, persons who send ’empty cases’ to court end up getting nothing.

“If you send nothing to the Supreme court you go home with nothing,” he said on the Key Points on TV3 on Saturday September 3 while commenting on the recent ‘attacks’ on the Supreme Court by former President John Dramani Mahama.

Mr Mahama indicated that the brand image of Ghana’s judiciary especially the Supreme Court, has been badly damaged.

In his view, the judiciary is lately subjected to public mockery because the people no longer feel they can get justice.

Mr Mahama whose election petition was unanimously dismissed by the highest court of the land after the 2020 general elections intimated that the time has come for the judiciary to undergo self-cleansing but, he added, the current Chief Justice Kwasi Anin-Yeboah cannot lead that process.

He said these while opening the 2nd Annual Lawyers Conference of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) on Sunday August 28.

“Recently, so badly has the image of our judiciary deteriorated that many of our citizenry openly make mockery of our justice system and of our justices. The phrase ‘go to court’ is these days met with derisive laughter instead of hope that one will truly get justice if he went to the court.

“If people are not poking fun about politics and inducement being used to sway the hand of justice in the Lower Courts then it is poking fun and making statements about the 7:0 of the the unanimous FC, verdicts which mostly involve cases of a political nature in our Supreme court, this is an unfortunate but serious development.
READ ALSO: But for IMF, economy would have collapsed under you – Gabby to Mahama

“One of the scariest existential threats to any democracy is when citizens think their judiciary holds no value for them or no use to them, this is the security threat that the National Security apparatus tried to draw the attention of the nation to recently but was poorly received by the President and hIs party.
READ ALSO: Mahama should have proven by now that no one got 50% – Oppong Nkrumah

“It is scary because it threatens the peace and stability of our democracy and we must quickly correct this fast spreading notion. If care is not taken, we will get to a state where people will have no qualms about taking the law into their own hands because they do not have the confidence that they can get any justice in the system

‘There is therefore, the urgent need for the Ghanaian judiciary to work to win the trust and confidence of the citizenry and erase the widely-held perception of hostility and political bias in legal proceedings at the highest court of the land.

“Unfortunately, we have no hope that the current leadership of our judiciary can lead such a process of change, we can only hope that the new Chief Justice will lead the process to repair the broken image that our judiciary has acquired over the last few years.”

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 0
DISQUS: 0